 |
|
 |
 |

|
BTI 2008
|
|
|
Nicaragua Country Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status Index
|
1-10
|
6.08
|
# 54 of 125
|
|
|
|
|
Democracy
|
1-10
|
6.65
|
# 49 of 125
|

|
|
|
|
Market Economy
|
1-10
|
5.50
|
# 63 of 125
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Index
|
1-10
|
5.57
|
# 47 of 125
|
|
|
|
|
scale: 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest)
|
score
|
rank
|
trend
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please cite
as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2008 — Nicaragua Country
Report. Gütersloh:
Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2007.
© 2007 Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh
|
|
Key Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population
|
mn.
|
5.1
|
|
HDI
|
0.70
|
|
GDP p.c.
|
$
|
3,269
|
|
Pop. growth1
|
% p.a.
|
0.5
|
|
HDI rank of 177
|
112
|
|
Gini Index
|
|
43.1
|
|
Life expectancy
|
years
|
70
|
|
UN Education Index
|
0.75
|
|
Poverty3
|
%
|
79.9
|
|
Urban population
|
%
|
59.0
|
|
Gender equality2
|
-
|
|
Aid per capita
|
$
|
134.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: UNDP, Human Development Report 2006 | The World Bank,
World Development Indicators 2007 | OECD Development Assistance Committee
2006. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate 1990-2005. (2) Gender
Empowerment Measure (GEM). (3) Percentage of population living on less than
$2 a day.
|
|
|
Executive Summary
|
|
|
Turbulent politics ruled the day in
Nicaragua during 2005 and 2006. The pacto político, a power-sharing agreement between Sandinista
leader Daniel Ortega and Liberal Constitutional Party (PLC) leader Arnoldo Alemán, sustained its
strong influence on Nicaraguan politics. This influence led parliament to
pass constitutional reforms curtailing executive powers at the turn of the
year from 2004 to 2005. President Enrique Bolaños
rejected the reforms as a violation of the separation of powers. This spiraled into a crisis that largely halted ordinary
political activity until October 2005, when internal and external support for
Bolaños facilitated a compromise to postpone the
proposed reforms until January 2007. In the meantime, the Bolaños
administration resumed pursuit of a sound reform strategy. The elections in
November 2006 were mostly free and fair. A split between the conservative
parties allowed Ortega to win the presidential elections with 38% of the vote
after three previous unsuccessful campaigns. Political turbulence is likely
to continue, because the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) does not
control a majority in parliament. The establishment of two “new” promising
parties before the elections in 2006 shows promise for Nicaragua’s political
future however. These new parties mark a potential break with the clientelism and polarization that have trapped Nicaraguan
politics in a deadlock between the dominant camps of Sandinistas and
Liberals, and they may well better represent societal interests in the
future. The approval of democracy by the Nicaraguan people increased in 2006,
but satisfaction with democracy in Nicaragua was low. With regard to economic
developments, poverty persists despite macroeconomic achievements. Economic
growth was relatively high, inflation contained and budget deficits reduced,
but the chronic current account deficit persisted. The Bolaños
administration achieved some major reform goals, most notably debt relief
through a number of different initiatives and the ratification of the
Dominican Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA). It was
the first administration since 1990 to successfully finish an IMF program.
|
|
|
History and Characteristics of Transformation
|
|
|
Nicaragua declared its independence from
Spanish rule in 1821. It finally achieved independence after the end of the
Central American Federation in 1838, but this did not end foreign influence
and domination. Spanish rule had only covered the Pacific side of the
country; British occupation of the territories on the Caribbean coast would
only end 56 years after Nicaragua’s independence.
The predominant foreign influence for the
past 150 years has been the United States. In order to counterbalance British
influence, Nicaraguan officials turned to the United States in 1849 for
protection from foreign intervention, in return for exclusive transit rights
across Nicaragua. During the civil war between Liberals from the northern
town of Leon and Conservatives from the town of Granada on Lake Nicaragua
(1854 –1855), the Liberals called on U.S.-American William Walker to bring
troops to their aid. After the surrender of the Conservatives, William Walker
assumed power and control of the Nicaraguan army and installed himself as
Nicaraguan president. This led to the “National War (1856 – 1857),” in which
Conservatives and Liberals, aided by Central American forces, jointly fought
Walker and defeated him. The National War was a unique occurrence in
Nicaraguan politics.
Evolving from civil war, cooperation in
the war against Walker enabled Nicaraguans to overcome a symptomatic
bipartisanship of the country’s politics. U.S. influence remained strong even
after the decision to dig a canal across the Central American isthmus was
made in favor of Panama instead of Nicaragua.
Tensions between Liberals and Conservatives tightened again, and various
uprisings between 1909 and 1912 provoked U.S. military intervention in favor of Conservative candidates. Military presence
lasted until 1933, but armed conflicts persisted. The considerable death toll
inflicted on U.S. troops by the rebel forces of Augusto
César Sandino induced the
United States to withdraw.
Despite the withdrawal of its troops, the
United States maintained a strong influence on Nicaraguan politics during the
following four decades, during which it backed the autocratic governments
under different members of the Somoza family. Gross human rights violations
by the National Guard in response to mounting opposition within the country
and guerrilla attacks by the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN)
disposed the Carter administration to end U.S. support for the Somoza kleptocracy. During the Nicaraguan Revolution, Anastasio Somoza Debayle waged
a full-blown war against opposition forces. Having lost U.S. support and
military aid as well as facing a severe economic crisis and a further
strengthened FSLN, Somoza went into exile to Miami on 17 July 1979. Three
days later, the multiparty exile government entered Managua, which marked the
culmination of the Nicaraguan Revolution. Approximately 50,000 Nicaraguans
died during the insurrection. Within one year of the end of the revolution,
the FSLN had consolidated its leadership of the new government, of the
military and police force as well as of organized interest groups. Although
most Nicaraguans were in favor of the revolution,
the emerging dominance of Sandinistas provoked dissent. When Ronald Reagan
took office in 1981, the situation worsened for the new government. The new
U.S. administration suspended all aid to Nicaragua and instead funded
counter-revolutionary Contras – former National Guard members in exile – to
overthrow the government. Nicaragua became a stage for Cold War
confrontation.
After the Nicaraguan Revolution, the new
government faced a severe economic and social crisis. GDP had fallen by more
than 30% between 1977 and 1979, inflation was rising sharply and the banking
sector was bankrupt due to massive capital flight. In addition, 600,000
Nicaraguans were homeless and food supplies exhausted. Foreign debt had
skyrocketed during the last years of Somoza’s rule,
equaling GDP by the time he left office, and debt
services accounted for up to half of state revenues. The Sandinista regime
nationalized the enormous wealth of the Somoza family and its associates as
well as the domestic banks and foreign trade. From 1978 to 1980, the state’s
share in generating GDP rose from 15% to 41%. The Sandinistas introduced
drastic economic measures and adjustment programs during an internally and
externally induced economic crisis at the end of the 1980s, characterized in
1988 by hyperinflation of up to 10,000% and foreign debt that equaled 500% of GDP.
The Contras’ raids eroded the social
revolutionary Sandinista regime’s acceptance of political pluralism. Civil
liberties were confined and social spending reduced to benefit the military
budget. Still, the Sandinista government held and won technically correct
elections in 1984 that were considered for the most part free and fair by
international election observers. As part of the Central American peace
process initiated in 1987, the government accelerated political opening and
sought a negotiated solution for the armed conflict with the Contras. The
following elections of 1990 marked an important step in Nicaragua’s history:
the first peaceful and accepted transfer of power by free elections was
achieved, and a civil government that had not earned its merits in armed
conflict assumed office. Civil presidents have been governing ever since,
legitimized through competitive elections in 1990, 1996, 2001 and 2006.
Nonetheless, Nicaragua’s society has not overcome the strong polarization
predominant since the end of Sandinista rule. As candidate of the opposition
coalition Unión Nacional Opositora (UNO), Violeta
Barrios de Chamorro won the election against the incumbent Sandinista
president Daniel Ortega. The difficult process of reintegrating the rebels,
the delayed de-politicization of the armed and security forces and fierce
conflicts with parliament marked Chamorro’s term of
office (1990 – 1997). Due to her policy of reconciliation toward the
Sandinistas, she soon lost the support of a large part of her coalition,
bringing about conflicts with parliament as well as considerable governance
problems. The succeeding Alemán government (1997 –
2002) of the Liberal Constitutional Party (PLC) on the other hand had a
secure parliamentary majority. Alemán’s
autocratic-populist style of governance, rampant corruption and power-sharing
arrangements with the Sandinistas however undermined the balance of power and
impaired the functioning of state institutions. The Bolaños
government (2002 – 2007) initiated an anti-corruption campaign against Alemán that resulted in a stalemate between the different
state powers. This institutional logjam frustrated the Bolaños
government’s ability to govern. Although ultimately convicted of
embezzlement, Alemán maintained his power base in
parliament and made further power-sharing agreements with Sandinista party
leader Ortega. As regards economic policy, the transfer of power in 1990
spelled the end of the “mixed economy” of the Sandinista era. The Chamorro
government followed a rigorous program of stabilization and structural
adjustment based on a strictly market-economic and export-oriented
development model. It abolished the foreign trade monopoly and most price
controls, opened up the banking sector and privatized some 350 state-owned
businesses.
The succeeding governments remained
faithful to this development model and, in collaboration with international
lenders, continued to pursue transformation toward a market economy. However,
corruption and nepotism during Alemán’s term as
president and parliament’s partial paralysis during Chamorro’s
and Bolaños’ presidential terms impeded
transformation. Even today, almost three decades after the revolution, per
capita income still has not reached the level of 1977. Nevertheless, the
Human Development Index has been increasing steadily since the end of the
Somoza dynasty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transformation Status
|
|
|
|
|
I. Democracy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Stateness
|
|
|
|
|
In principle, the state’s monopoly on the
use of force extends throughout the entire country. The incidence of violent
crime compared to other Latin American countries is astonishingly low. Large
scale armed conflict comparable to the conflicts between Recompas
and Recontras during the Chamorro administration
(1990 – 1997) today is highly unlikely. However, smaller violent conflicts
concerning land disputes in rural areas and social protests in urban areas
flare up occasionally. In parts of the country, the state has little
presence, and crime in urban areas is growing due to poor law enforcement. In
the autonomous regions on the Atlantic Coast, the lacking presence of state
authorities has allowed drug trafficking to increase severely.
|
|
Monopoly on the use of force
|
|
|
Defining citizenship and who qualifies as
a citizen is not a politically relevant issue. All citizens formally have the
same civic rights. The nation-state is widely accepted as legitimate. Only in
the two autonomous regions along the Atlantic coast, a small but growing
separatist movement has gathered strength due to their desperate socioeconomic
situation and central government neglect.
|
|
State
identity
|
|
|
Church and state are formally separate,
although the church exerts great political influence. Under the Alemán government, church and state were in fact tightly
interwoven, even with respect to finances. The Bolaños
government distanced itself from the church and insisted on the secular
nature of the state. While the Catholic Church is still a very strong interest
group, its influence does not lead to a direct transfer of religious dogmas
into law. Laws banning therapeutic abortions or criminalizing same sex
relationships show the influence of the Church, although politicians
ultimately made the decisions.
|
|
No interference
of religious dogmas
|
|
|
State infrastructure and administrative
institutions are present almost everywhere in the country. Partly due to
social exclusions, some parts of the population do not have access to state
institutions, which in addition are somewhat functionally deficient. In
remote regions, peace commissions run by local citizens resolve disputes.
|
|
Basic
administration
|
|
|
2 | Political Participation
|
|
|
|
|
The right to vote by general, direct,
equal, secret and free ballot is constitutionally guaranteed. Democratic
elections take place regularly on the national and regional level.
Presidential and parliamentary elections were last held in November 2006,
elections in the two autonomous regions in March 2006 and municipal elections
in November 2004. Although the pacto político has given the Sandinista National Liberation
Front (FSLN) the majority in the electoral council, campaigning and voting in
the 2006 presidential and parliamentary elections were generally free and
fair. Only during the last days of the vote count for the parliamentary
elections did some observers note serious irregularities. They claimed that
an unproportionally large number of seats were
awarded to the Liberal Constitutional Party (PLC), enough to end the
elections as runner-up and to outnumber the Alianza
Liberal Nicaragüense (ALN-PC). Observers ascribed
this to an offer by the FSLN to prolong the pacto político. Yet the PLC also challenged the vote summation
in the Atlantic Autonomous Region, based on the claim that it had been
deprived of one seat. A national observer organization that had collected all
tally sheets verified this claim, but the national electoral council awarded
the seat to the FSLN.
|
|
Free and
fair elections
|
|
|
In principle, the power to govern is
vested in the elected representatives, but serious conflicts between state
institutions continually pushed the country to the verge of ungovernability during the observation period. These
conflicts can usually be traced back to elite agreements based on
self-interest that diminish the influence of elections on political outcomes.
Consequently, voter turnout has seriously decreased. In the national
elections of 2006, 70% of the electorate used its right to vote, as compared
to 90% in 2001. After the extensive de-politicization of the armed and
security forces in the 1990s, extra-constitutional veto powers no longer
exist within the country. Considering Nicaragua’s dependence on ODA, the veto
power held by international financial institutions, donors and especially the
U.S. administration cannot be ignored.
|
|
Effective
power to govern
|
|
|
There is unrestricted freedom of
association and of assembly de jure. However, de
facto economic constraints inhibit the freedom of association and of
assembly. All public and private sector workers except the military and the
police are entitled to form and join unions of their own choosing. Half of
Nicaragua’s workforce, including agricultural workers, is unionized.
|
|
Association
/ assembly rights
|
|
|
Freedom of speech and of the press are
guaranteed by the constitution and vigorously exercised. A law passed in 2001
that would require journalists to register with a national body is under
appeal at the Nicaraguan Supreme Court. Other restrictions include the
classification of libel as a criminal offence, laws requiring journalists to
reveal their sources under special circumstances and a constitutional
provision stipulating that freedom of information applies only to “truthful”
information. In spite of these potentially harmful legal provisions, debate
in the Nicaraguan press and public is vibrant and the legal possibilities to
restrict freedom of speech are not used. President Bolaños
put an end to the practice of using public advertising to punish and reward
the media. Bolaños introduced a new system based on
market shares to distribute public advertising funds, which has caused
smaller media outlets to close. Repression of journalists is rare. Still,
journalists investigating alleged links between drug traffickers and police
officials on the Atlantic coast have been harassed. The murder of journalist María José Bravo by the outgoing mayor of El Ayote, Eugenio Hernández, during the regional elections in 2004 was the
first political murder of a journalist in Nicaragua for years. Hernández was sentenced to 25 years in prison for
premeditated murder. Nicaragua has 11 private television stations, two daily
newspapers and 187 radio stations. The Sandinistas transferred radio and
television stations to their supporters before handing over power in 1990.
Therefore, radio and television coverage generally favors
the Sandinistas. Newspapers are to a large extent in the hands of the
Chamorro family. Access to media reveals the extent of social exclusion due
to poverty. 80% of households own a radio, 60% a television and 20% a fixed
telephone line. More than 750,000 people own a cellular phone and about
20,000 people have an Internet subscription.
|
|
Freedom of
expression
|
|
|
3 | Rule of Law
|
|
|
|
|
State power is subject to the law.
Besides the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, there is an
institution responsible for organizing and holding elections (the Supreme
Electoral Council). There is a formal balance of power, but this balance is
compromised by the blatant politicization of state institutions. Due to the
weak judiciary, checks and balances are mainly performed through the
executive and legislative branches of government. When state powers are in
conflict, they block one another to a dangerous extent, sometimes exceeding
their authority. During such conflicts, the challenged governmental branch
actively seeks the balance of power. When parliament revised the pacto político of 2000 by
passing constitutional reforms in late 2004 and early 2005 that would curtail
executive powers, President Bolaños rejected the
reforms as a violation of the separation of powers thus precipitating a
serious political crisis. The crisis lasted until October 2005, when internal
and external support for Bolaños facilitated a
compromise to postpone the proposed reforms until January 2007 when the newly
sworn-in president Ortega postponed them for yet another year and introduced
bills to strengthen executive power.
|
|
Separation
of powers
|
|
|
The judicial branch is institutionally
differentiated, formally independent and constitutionally guaranteed 4% of
state expenditure. However, it is subject to strong political influence and
corruption, does not adequately cover the entire country and demonstrates
considerable functional deficiencies. The training of judges is inadequate
and the reforms of the Bolaños government aimed at
a more professional and independent judiciary were protracted by parliament.
The political influence of the pacto político worsened the already low performance of the
judiciary system during the evaluation period. It has lost its credibility
with the population.
|
|
Independent
judiciary
|
|
|
Corruption is a fundamental problem in
the country’s political culture. For a long time, it merely attracted
negative publicity but went unpunished. In the course of president Bolaños’ anti-corruption campaign however, former
president Alemán was prosecuted and sentenced for
corruption (20 years in prison). Still, Bolaños’
fight against corruption experienced a serious backlash when he admitted to
having negotiated special treatment for Alemán and
refrained from charging other officials of the Alemán
administration in exchange for parliamentary support from the PLC. The PLC
continues to accept Alemán’s leadership despite of
his conviction and the different attempts made by Bolaños,
Montealegre and, most recently, Rizo
(following the 2006 elections) to challenge his standing. Not even under
Ortega have the Sandinistas distanced themselves from Alemán.
They instead continued to side with him against the government, which serves
their mutual favor. The Sandinistas exerted their
influence over the Supreme Court to allow Alemán to
serve his sentence at his home, although they did not sacrifice all leverage
over him by suspending his sentence. This example reveals the extent to which
politics – rather than the rule of law – determines the prosecution of
corrupt officeholders.
|
|
Prosecution
of office abuse
|
|
|
Civil freedoms and human rights are
granted and are largely respected. However, the weakness of the judiciary
impedes the state’s ability to respond to violations of those rights. For
example, threats against and harassment of human rights defenders as well as
excessive use of force by public security forces are a problem but only a
small number of cases are reported. Abuses have been investigated in the past
and some of the offenders were punished, but a certain degree of impunity
persists. Violence against women and children, including domestic violence,
rape and sexual exploitation are prevalent. The constitution provides for
freedom of religion, and the government’s policy and practice generally
respect these rights in full. The constitution also prohibits discrimination.
Still, discrimination against indigenous people occurs, and salary
discrimination against women is recurrent. Women earn less than half of men’s
salaries. Long distances and a lack of financial means hamper access to
justice, especially for those living in rural areas. Local peace commissions
and programs to train laypersons to become rural judicial facilitators have
proven successful in spreading access to disadvantaged communities.
|
|
Civil
rights
|
|
|
4 | Stability of Democratic Institutions
|
|
|
|
|
Democratic institutions are stable
and essentially fulfill their functions. Yet they
are not particularly effective and institutional rivalries result in heavy
efficiency losses. Political power struggles are perpetuated at the
institutional level and regularly lead to political crises and stalemates. In
2002, parliament’s work was brought to a standstill during the struggle
surrounding the revocation of Alemán’s immunity. In
2005, the cooperation of the Sandinistas and the PLC against the government
escalated to the point that president Bolaños was
at the brink of declaring the state of emergency. The politicization of the
Comptroller General and the Supreme Electoral Council by the pacto político has undermined
the two institutions’ legitimacy. Yet, the mostly free and fair organization
of the elections in 2006 positively surprised many observers. The judiciary
performs worst of all democratic institutions.
|
|
Performance
of democratic institutions
|
|
|
All relevant actors accept democratic
institutions. The support for these institutions is however strongly linked
to political power interests and is therefore unstable. The sudden change of
Ortega’s position from strengthening the legislature to strengthening the
executive after his election as president is a very good example of this behavior. It is actors from within the political sphere –
and not from the outside – that damage democratic institutions.
|
|
Commitment
to democratic institutions
|
|
|
5 | Political and Social Integration
|
|
|
|
|
The landscape of political parties is
highly polarized and used to show characteristics of a two-party system. The
party system fragmentation is moderate with an effective number of parties of
3.13. Political parties are very much based on personalities. Yet, the two
decisive political camps until the elections 2006, the Liberals and the
Sandinistas, also have steady social bases and programmatic platforms. These
social bases are maintained partly by clientelistic
structures and the partisan infiltration of associations and interest groups,
which leads to low voter volatility. This was apparent in the 2006 elections,
when two thirds of Nicaraguans voted for the FSLN and PLC, even though the
sustained pacto político
compromised the differing basic programmatic goals of both parties. While it
would seem that the pacto político
overcame Nicaragua’s strong political polarization, the parties’ leaders
acted not for societal interests but solely for their own personal gain. The
elections in 2006 brought about a very positive development. Herty Lewites, the former FSLN
mayor of Managua, demanded primaries within the party to decide on the
presidential candidate for the elections. As a consequence, he and his
followers were expelled from the FSLN and joined the Movimiento
de Renovación Sandinista (MRS). Lewites
and the MRS clearly led the polls in the run-up to the elections, but Lewites died of a heart attack in July 2006 and his
successor, Edmundo Jarquín,
could not uphold the momentum. Within the PLC, Alemán
was also challenged. Like Herty Lewites,
former PLC minister Eduardo Montealegre demanded a
primary election to choose the party’s next presidential candidate. He also
failed and Alemán installed a loyal candidate, José
Rizo. In the aftermath, Montealegre
formed the Alianza Liberal Nicaragüense
(ALN-PC) of his followers from the PLC, the Partido
de la Resistencia Nicaragüense
(PRN) and the Partido Conservador
(PC). Until these events, the only way in which Nicaraguans could express
their frustration about politicians’ self-interested actions and political
stalemate was by abstaining from voting. The foundation of the MRS and the
ALN-PC introduced a possibility to break with clientelism
and the polarization between both influential political camps. This could
allow the party system to aggregate and articulate societal interests better
in future. They show willingness to reform and can be characterized as center-left (MRS) and center-right
parties. However, both parties still lack clear programmatic and social bases
and depend on personalities. Certainly, the future of the MRS is more
endangered after the death of Lewites, but the PRN
also still has to establish itself in the long-term. If the pacto político remains intact
during the Ortega presidency, this will require a very well-designed strategy
and professional management of the party. Personal power ambitions and inner
party conflicts occasionally lead to party splits that can affect
parliamentary majorities. This happened in 2002, when the liberal party split
between followers of Bolaños and followers of Alemán, and earlier during the administration of Violeta Barrios de Chamorro, when the UNO alliance of
parties fell apart.
|
|
Party
system
|
|
|
Interest groups are able to organize
themselves and have played an important role in the country’s history, but
they are to some extent under the influence of partisan actors. Socioeconomic
bottlenecks and the greater influence of partisan organizations limit the
balancing of social interests. The NGO sector has become an important
economic sector that receives strong financial support from external actors. While
most of these organizations are active in the fields of self-help, there are
also some very qualified lobbying groups. These do not only include
subsidiaries of international NGOs, but also local groups that are skilled in
advocacy and have specialist think tanks to call on for research. Yet overall
the intermediation between society and the political system needs serious
improvement, and the general mistrust between civil society, the government
and political parties must be overcome.
|
|
Interest groups
|
|
|
Approval of the democratic form of
government increased during the evaluation period. While in 1998 72% of
respondents to Latinobarómetro polls indicated that
democracy is preferable to all other forms of government, the approval rating
had declined to 39% by 2004, then increased again to 56% in 2006. But
satisfaction with democracy as practiced in Nicaragua was low, at 26%. If the
described problems of the political system and the self-serving attitude of
politicians are considered, this is only worrisome because these problems are
endemic to Nicaraguan politics. Only 15% of Nicaraguans said that the country
is governed for the good of all. The data proves however that the low
approval rating is not endemic. When Bolaños took
office and launched his anti-corruption campaign, approval ratings soared
from 43% in 2001 to 63% in 2002.
|
|
Consent to
democratic norms
|
|
|
Self-organization among the population
encounters socioeconomic barriers and is therefore generally weak. Self-help
organizations are active to combat the most pressing social ills, like the
prevalence of street children and drug abuse, but the lack of funds prevents
major successes. The trust among the population generally is low. Wounds inflicted
during the Somoza dictatorship and the Contra war have
yet to heal.
|
|
Associational activities
|
|
|
II. Market Economy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 | Level of Socioeconomic Development
|
|
|
|
|
The
country’s development status is low. Nicaragua is the second poorest country
in Latin America. Social exclusion through poverty and social hardship is
quantitatively and qualitatively very pronounced and structurally entrenched.
Since 1993, the population living on $1 per day or less has decreased slightly
from 50% to 46%, but has not improved further during the last five years
despite a sound macroeconomic performance. The incidence of poverty is
distributed unequally: 29% of the population in urban areas and 68% of the
population in rural areas. The level of absolute poverty has decreased from
19% to 15% and has also remained unchanged for the last five years. In the
rural areas, 27% of the population lives in absolute poverty. Considering
population growth, the stagnation of poverty indicators implies an increase
in absolute numbers. While the official unemployment figure was below 6% in
2006, underemployment is estimated at around 45%. The income Gini Index is at 43.1 (2001) and indicates social
inequality. Nicaragua’s Human Development Index value was 0.698 in 2004,
placing Nicaragua at the rank of 112th of 177 countries. The Gender-related
Development Index (GDI) showed a slightly worse score, with a value of 0.684
(rank: 88th).
|
|
Socioeconomic barriers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic indicators
|
|
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP
|
$ mn.
|
4,026
|
4,102
|
4,498
|
4,911
|
|
Growth of GDP
|
%
|
0.8
|
2.5
|
5.1
|
4.0
|
|
Inflation (CPI)
|
%
|
4
|
5.1
|
8.4
|
9.4
|
|
Unemployment
|
%
|
12.2
|
7.8
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign direct investment
|
% of GDP
|
5.1
|
4.9
|
5.6
|
4.9
|
|
Export growth
|
%
|
-3.5
|
9.2
|
16.1
|
5.3
|
|
Import growth
|
%
|
-0.1
|
3.5
|
8.2
|
6.2
|
|
Current account balance
|
$ mn.
|
-698.6
|
-651.1
|
-695.6
|
-799.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public debt
|
$ mn.
|
5,573.2
|
5,893.5
|
4,125.1
|
4,113.2
|
|
External debt
|
$ mn.
|
6,482.6
|
6,910.8
|
5,145.2
|
5,143.6
|
|
External debt service
|
% of GNI
|
4
|
4.8
|
2.9
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash surplus or deficit
|
% of GDP
|
-1.7
|
-1.9
|
-1.1
|
-0.7
|
|
Tax Revenue
|
% of GDP
|
13.5
|
15.2
|
15.7
|
16.6
|
|
Government consumption
|
% of GDP
|
10.7
|
11.4
|
11.2
|
11.1
|
|
Public expnd. on edu.
|
% of GDP
|
3.1
|
3.1
|
-
|
-
|
|
Public expnd. on
health
|
% of GDP
|
3.9
|
3.7
|
3.9
|
-
|
|
R&D expenditure
|
% of GDP
|
0.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Military expenditure
|
% of GDP
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
0.7
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: The World Bank, World
Development Indicators 2007 | UNESCO Institute for Statistics | Stockholm
International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Yearbook: Armaments,
Disarmament and International Security
|
|
|
|
|
7 | Organization of the Market and Competition
|
|
|
|
|
Since the 1990s, the governments have
been pursuing a strict market economic and export-oriented development model,
based on the private economy and oriented toward the principles of free
market competition. However, the rules of the game are not always followed.
Apart from the possibility of presidential decrees that can suddenly change
those rules, the greatest threats to a market economy are the aforementioned
problems of corruption and a weak legal system. Besides utilities like energy
and water, the state controls the prices of only very few products. The
minimum wage differs for the different sectors of the economy and is lowest
in agriculture at $42 a month. According to the central bank, the informal
sector accounts for almost two-thirds of jobs. Profits can be used and
transferred freely. There is no limitation on currency convertibility.
Foreign and domestic investments are treated equally. Yet, in a cluster
approach to development, the Bolaños administration
favored some sectors, like the tourism and maquila industry, by offering tax exemptions on profits,
building materials and property. The Doing Business Report of the World Bank
ranks Nicaragua 67th out of 175 countries. FDI inflows are concentrated on maquila operations and tourism projects. FDI inflows made
up 5.5% of GDP in 2006 and cemented the trust of international investors.
|
|
Market-based
competition
|
|
|
In September 2006, parliament finally
approved the competition promotion law with bipartisan support that had been
discussed since the 1990s. The law comes into effect in May 2007 as a result
of negotiations between the private sector, the Bolaños
administration and parliament. It prohibits anti-competitive practices and
installs a national institute for competition promotion to enforce the law.
Government and private sector delegates head the institute. Especially small-
and medium-sized enterprises should benefit in the future.
|
|
Anti-monopoly
policy
|
|
|
Foreign trade has been liberalized since
1990. Trade openness measured by the ratio of imports and exports compared to
GDP is high, at 87% in 2006. Nicaragua has abolished all WTO-inconsistent
non-tariff barriers and does not have import prohibitions on commercial
grounds. Nicaragua does not subsidize exports directly, or provide export
financing. The MFN rate (most favorable nation
rate) declined sharply during the 1990s and is now at around 4%. Nicaragua is
also a member of different regional and bilateral trade agreements. It is
very well integrated in Central America and has strong trade ties with the
United States. Integration will further improve due to Nicaragua’s membership
of the Dominican Republic-Central American Free-Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) that
Nicaragua signed in December 2003 and which came into effect in April 2006.
|
|
Liberalization
of foreign trade
|
|
|
Nicaragua’s banking sector is
underdeveloped and the smallest in Latin America. The banking sector expanded
during the 1990s with the founding of 14 new private banks. State banks were
closed or privatized between 1994 and 2000. In 2001, the last state-owned
bank, Banco Nicaragüense
de Industria y Comercio,
was closed due to severe losses. Many households were left without access to
credit from the formal banking sector since the closing of the state-owned
national development bank BANADES in 1998. The private banking sector is
hardly present in rural areas. Microfinance institutions have partially
filled this gap. Today, the banking sector consists of seven banks and two
finance companies. Foreign ownership of banks has increased in 2005 and 2006
through investments of Citigroup, HSBC and General Electric. The state
monopoly on insurance was abolished in 1997. Four private insurance companies
have developed besides the state owned insurer INISER. On Nicaragua’s stock
exchange, Bolsanic, mainly government-issued bonds
are traded. In June 2006, 84% of credits and 68% of deposits were dollarized. Total assets of the banking sector rose by
20% in 2006, totaling more than 3 billion USD.
Credit expanded by 34% to above 32% of GDP. Household credits made up 30% and
commercial credits 27% of total credits outstanding. Despite the expansion,
intermediation is still very weak and hinders economic development. The high
exposure of banks to the public sector is also worrisome, with 82% of
investments made in public debt papers. The capital adequacy ratio increased
by one percentage point to 14.8%, well above the 10% mandated by Nicaragua’s
banking supervision. The aggregated net profits of the sector increased by
14% to $60 million during the review period. The average return on assets was
1.9% and on equity 20%. The percentage of non-performing loans was very low
at 2.1%, but strong credit growth might raise the risk. After the closing of
state banks and the bankruptcy of two smaller private banks at the end of the
1990s, a severe banking crisis was triggered in July 2000 when Interbank, the major bank at the time with a market share
of 15%, went bankrupt. Within the next twelve months, three more private
banks followed. The central bank lent its support by intervening to protect
bank deposits. The requirements for banking operations had already become
stricter when the National Assembly approved a series of laws to meet the
principles of the Basel Accords in 1999. Since the crisis, the banking system
has been regulated even more strictly in close cooperation with the IMF.
Independent supervision of the banking sector was further strengthened and
its scope of operations enlarged during the review period. The minimum
capital needed to found a private bank was increased to $10 million and the
practice of lending to related companies confined by limiting loans to a
single borrower to 15% of a bank’s capital. In 2000, a law was passed
providing deposit insurance up to $20,000. Nicaragua also ratified its
commitments to the 1997 WTO Financial Services Agreement, covering most
banking services.
|
|
Banking
system
|
|
|
8 | Currency and Price Stability
|
|
|
|
|
In Nicaragua, the central bank is not
an autonomous institution, but still pursues a largely consistent inflation
and exchange rate policy despite political fluctuations. Since 1998, the
inflation rate declined from 18.5% to 4% in 2002 mainly due to fiscal and
monetary discipline. Inflation increased again to about 9.5% in 2005 and
stabilized at 9.1% in 2006. This was mainly due to higher energy prices on
the supply side and higher wages as well as credit growth on the demand side.
The Nicaraguan currency (córdoba) has been devalued
annually by a crawling peg mechanism since 1993. The crawling peg stood at an
annual rate of 12% until 1999. In November 1999, it was adjusted to 6%, and
since January 2004, it stands at 5%. The sustainability of the peg and its
continuous decline prove the success of Nicaragua’s exchange-driven monetary
policy, creating greater stability of currency and prices as well as greater
certainty for economic actors. Since 2004, the Córdoba
has remained stable against the U.S. dollar in real terms, which provides a favorable environment for exports. It is expected that a
new PRGF with the IMF will include a framework to gradually shift to a
floating system. The central bank also was successful in building up foreign
reserves. Excessive public spending and the banking crisis caused foreign
reserves to drop below $400 million in 2001. Since then, they more than
doubled to $870 million and covered three months of imports in August 2006.
However, owing to the weakness of the current account, Nicaragua’s gross foreign
reserves remain dependent on foreign assistance.
|
|
Anti-inflation
/ forex policy
|
|
|
Pushed by international lenders and their
own commitments, Nicaraguan governments have been pursuing a policy of
continuous stability since the 1990s. The Bolaños
administration pursued a very well-designed fiscal and debt policy to support
macroeconomic stability. The continuous improvements are shown by the fiscal
deficit before grants that decreased from 9% in the period of 1999 to 2001 to
5.6% in the period of 2002 to 2006. After grants, the budget deficit has
remained below 2% since 2002. Debt relief in recent years through the HIPC
initiative, the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) and bilateral
schemes considerably reduced Nicaragua’s external debts. While external debt
stood at 170% of GDP in 2003, it was estimated at 70% at the end of 2006.
When internal debt is also considered, total public debt was estimated at 80%
of GDP. On the one hand, internal debt that is contracted on commercial terms
must be restructured. On the other, the debt service ratio for external debt
of 5.0 is sustainable and will decrease further thanks to export growth and
the coming into effect of further debt relief.
|
|
Macrostability
|
|
|
9 | Private Property
|
|
|
|
|
In principle, property rights are
well-defined. However, poorly enforced property rights and property disputes
remain one of the most serious barriers to economic development in Nicaragua.
The Sandinista regime expropriated and collectivized many properties,
residences and companies. Subsequently, these were redistributed to agrarian
collectives, and, during the piñata before power was handed over in 1990,
they were also given to Sandinista leaders and top government officials.
Because most of these transfers were carried out without due legal process or
documentation to insure the new owners’ legal claim, there have been severe
conflicts with former owners who have since tried to reclaim their
properties. Farmers suffer the most from this legal uncertainty.
|
|
Property
rights
|
|
|
Since 1990, Nicaragua has privatized a
significant number of its public utilities and disposed of more than 350
government-owned enterprises. Yet, envisaged privatizations of the Bolaños administration mostly came to a halt during the evaluation
period due to opposition in parliament. The last large-scale privatization
took place in December 2003, when the government sold its remaining 49% of
the national telecommunications company Enitel. The
Bolaños administration failed to implement other
plans to strengthen private sector participation like the introduction of
private pension funds or concessions for operating parts of the national
water company. Although privatization did not progress further during the
evaluation period, private companies already are the backbone of the economy
and the appropriate legal framework is established.
|
|
Private enterprise
|
|
|
10 | Welfare Regime
|
|
|
|
|
Nicaragua faces severe social problems.
The small number of workers employed in the formal sector limits
participation in official social security schemes with determined
entitlements for old age, disability and health. Only 16% of the economically
active population is insured by the official system. Large segments of the
impoverished population, especially in rural areas, are beyond the reach of
the country’s social safety net. Systematic efforts to reduce poverty have
been planned and implemented since 2001 within the framework of the Poverty
Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP). These social protection schemes range from
food assistance, social infrastructure and programs for special target groups
to rural development. With a budget of about $50 million, the outreach of
these programs remains limited. Overall, the government spends about $700
million, or half of its budget, on the social and education sector.
Therefore, poverty-related spending has increased from 10.2% in 2002 to 13.6%
in 2006. Bear in mind however that most of the additional funds were used to
finance higher wages. In April 2000, a law was passed to change the pension
scheme from a pay-as-you-go system to an individually funded system. However,
due to uncertainties regarding the transition costs, implementation was
postponed and in November 2005 parliament repealed the law.
|
|
Social
safety nets
|
|
|
The society is socially heterogeneous.
There is a vast social gulf between the many poor and the few rich, and there
is a clear divide between urban and rural areas. The two formally autonomous
Atlantic regions are culturally very different from the rest of Nicaragua, as
well as economically disadvantaged and neglected by the state. These regions’
minority communities, both of African and indigenous descent, face extreme
poverty as well as administrative and political discrimination. Public
services cannot redress the existing imbalances to create equality of
opportunity. The increase of poverty-related spending during the last five
years did not show positive effects, since poverty levels only stagnated.
Availability of social services even deteriorated in some areas, such as
education and reproductive health. Women’s literacy and school enrollment rates are as high as those of men, but on
average women earn less than half as much as men.
|
|
Equal
opportunity
|
|
|
11 | Economic Performance
|
|
|
|
|
The Nicaraguan economy is weak in spite
of successful macroeconomic recovery since the 1990s. Per capita GDP still
has not reached the levels seen before the Nicaraguan Revolution. The economy
is extremely vulnerable given the weak fiscal situation, the large current
account deficit, the Nicaragua’s dependency on a small number of export
products and the location’s vulnerability to natural disasters like
hurricanes and volcanic activity. In addition, Nicaragua is highly dependent
on foreign aid. Other problems include high underemployment, low per capita
GDP and productivity growth, as well as a large public debt. The trade
deficit is the main reason for the large and chronic deficit of the current
account balance. Nicaragua’s economy lacks a sizable industrial base and
therefore has to import many goods from abroad. Nicaragua’s export base is
narrow and depends on commodities. Coffee is Nicaragua’s most important
export good and accounted for 21% of exports in 2006. The terms of trade are
continually worsening. With 1990 as the base year with a value of 100, they
dropped to 46 in 2006. Foreign reserves cover three months of imports.
Overall, Nicaragua is very vulnerable to external shocks. Economic growth is
relatively high however, and inflation is contained. Remittances from
Nicaraguans living abroad totaled $600 million in
2005 and helped finance the current account deficit. FDI inflows that
accounted for 5.5% of GDP in 2006 and foreign aid also stabilize the economy.
|
|
Output
strength
|
|
|
12 | Sustainability
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental consciousness is
underdeveloped in Nicaragua and subordinate to the push for growth. The 2005
Environmental Sustainability Index ranks Nicaragua 66th of 146 nations. Its
main problems are degradation, pollution and erosion of land, overfishing and uncontrolled logging. From 1990 to 2000,
the forest area was reduced from 37% to 27%. Economic growth in Nicaragua
usually stems from expanding the use of resources and not from productivity
gains, especially in agriculture. Therefore, Nicaragua’s environmental
sustainability will be at stake if the economy continues to grow without the
necessary adjustments for sustainability. The country has an institutional
and legal framework to address environmental matters, and has signed all
relevant international treaties. However, the lack of financial resources and
the social patterns of skills and attitudes are serious obstacles to an
effective response to environmental challenges. Nicaragua has however
collaborated internationally on environmental matters.
|
|
Environmental
policy
|
|
|
Education is a constitutional right. In
1950, two-thirds of adult Nicaraguans had not even completed one school year.
In 2005, this figure had dropped to 20%. Still, human capital is very low.
State and private educational institutions exist in all segments from
preschool to higher education, but their quality varies greatly. The
non-university public expenditures amount to 3% of GDP or 11% of state
expenditure. Although the ministry of education calculated that an increase
to at least 4.7% of GDP is needed to reach the respective Millennium
Development Goals, an agreement with the IMF prohibits any increases above
this level. Universities are entitled to an additional 6% share of public
expenditure under the constitution and, therefore, currently receive about
1.6% of GDP. Expenditure for research and development is below 0.2% of GDP.
Primary education is the main focus of educational expenditures. However, if
per student expenditures are considered, the focus of spending is not
directed at Nicaragua’s most pressing needs, especially if more equity is
sought. While in 2003 $100 was spent on each student in primary school and
$70 in secondary school, $930 was spent on each university student. Enrollment rates for primary school increased steadily to
85.5% in 2002 but have since declined to 80% in 2005. The net enrollment ratio for secondary school is about 40%. This
leaves more than 800,000 children – usually come from a poor background –
outside the school system. The completion rate for primary school (6th grade)
is 69%, and 34% for secondary school. One reason for the low completion rate
is the high incidence of dropouts due to economic reasons; another is the
poor teaching conditions. The pupil to teacher ratio is 36 for primary school
and 45 for secondary school. Teachers in Nicaragua are often poorly qualified
and despite wage increases in the last years only paid half of the average
income of Nicaraguan workers, or the lowest teacher salary in Latin America.
Student achievement was evaluated for the first time in 2002. In third grade,
only 30% of students had reached a minimum acceptable level of Spanish and
less than 14% had done so in mathematics. These figures did not increase for
students in sixth grade.
|
|
Education
policy / R&D
|
|
Transformation Management
|
|
|
|
|
I. Level of Difficulty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The level of difficulty at the
beginning of the evaluation period in 2005 had improved compared to 2003 due
to better macroeconomic conditions and lower debt burdens. However,
structural constraints to governance were still high. Per capita income was
low, the budget depended on donor contributions to a significant degree,
external debts were still high and internal debts rising, the vulnerability
to natural disasters and world economic influences was high, the quality of
transport infrastructure poor, and serious social problems such as widespread
poverty and underemployment persisted. The educational level of the
population, however, as measured against the U.N. Education Index, was in the
middle range. The rate of adults with HIV and AIDS was still very low but
increasing.
|
|
Structural constraints
|
|
|
During the Sandinista period, social
mobilization had reached a high level that decreased to a certain extent over
the course of the 1990s. Civic and public engagement was moderate at the
beginning of the evaluation period. However, social trust and trust in
institutions were both low.
|
|
Civil
society traditions
|
|
|
With the exception of regionally
concentrated minorities along the Atlantic coast, Nicaragua is an ethnically
homogeneous society of predominantly Spanish-speaking mestizos.
The line of ethnic conflict, therefore, had significance only in the Atlantic
region during the period under review. The prevailing lines of conflict are
politically and socially defined. Extreme political polarization and
socioeconomic disparities did lead to open political and social conflicts,
but resorting to violence had already become uncommon prior to the evaluation
period.
|
|
Conflict
intensity
|
|
|
II. Management Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 | Steering
Capability
|
|
|
|
|
In consultation with the international
donor community and to some extent with civil society, the Bolaños administration pursued the following goals:
establishing macroeconomic stability, reducing poverty, establishing the rule
of law, de-politicizing the administration, fighting corruption, increasing
the efficiency of public expenditures through structural reforms, fostering
regional economic integration and promoting foreign and domestic private
investment. The government’s medium and long-term strategy and action plans
were mainly consistent and its policy priorities reasonable, but plans were
sometimes over-optimistic with respect to the capabilities and resources
available and the prospects for success within the anticipated timeframe. The
government also postponed some reforms in order to seek consensus with the
opposition in parliament. Within the political leadership, a split is
apparent, with some members of the political elite setting priorities to
further their own personal gain and others to further the goals of democracy
and a market economy. Which group wins the upper hand will be decisive for future
development.
|
|
Prioritization
|
|
|
The Bolaños
administration achieved some major reform goals, most noticeably debt relief
under different initiatives and the ratification of DR-CAFTA. It was also the
first administration since 1990 to successfully finish an IMF program. The
precarious situation in parliament and the cooperation between Ortega and Alemán did not allow other reforms aimed at furthering
democracy and a market economy to come into effect. A particular example is
the reform aimed at a more independent and professional judiciary that was
blocked by parliament.
|
|
Implementation
|
|
|
The political leadership showed
willingness and ability to learn. The administration usually proved flexible
enough to make corrections and improvements in its economic, social and
political programs. Yet, policies and planning still do not sufficiently heed
the country’s vulnerability to natural catastrophes and world economic
influences, and also lack social cohesion. Despite the further increases of
political instability and obstruction in parliament, the Bolaños
administration showed great flexibility to implement the maximum of its
envisaged reforms possible under the given circumstances.
|
|
Policy
learning
|
|
|
15 | Resource Efficiency
|
|
|
|
|
In terms of generating revenues, the
government was successful in attracting aid and debt relief from outside, and
implemented a new tax code that provides more efficiency as well as equity
and higher revenues. In terms of expenditure, budgetary discipline continued
to improve during the evaluation period. In 2005, the government introduced a
law on the tax authority and budgetary system that establishes external
auditing and the consolidation of the entire public sector. Institutions are
installed to monitor expenditure execution, reporting and auditing but must
be improved. The government has not yet implemented a medium-term expenditure
framework. The quality of public service and of the bureaucracy, the
competence of civil servants and the independence of the civil service from
political pressures were low during the evaluation period. This resulted in a
percentile score of 24.9 in the World Bank’s governance indicator on
Government Effectiveness in 2005. The civil service law from 2003 establishes
compensation, career and employment policies based on merit
that have yet to be implemented consistently. The law on municipal
transfer initiated a decentralization process in 2004. It establishes that 4%
of central government tax revenues have to be channeled
to municipalities. The share is supposed to reach 10% by 2010. While
decentralization will show some positive effects on governance by empowering
municipalities and fostering local participation, the law also has
inadequacies: it does not transfer expenditure responsibilities along with
the funds, and it also lacks proper auditing provisions.
|
|
Efficient
use of assets
|
|
|
For the most part, the government
coordinated conflicting objectives in a very simplistic manner. Economic
growth was the clear priority. Therefore, policies mainly were intended to
increase economic growth, while other areas like environmental sustainability
received little attention. Yet the government also learned from past
shortcomings: for example, since economic growth did not reduce poverty as
expected, the government increased its poverty-related spending. Still, the
policy priority of economic growth dominated, and donor funds were used most
often for increased social expenditures that would not have been available
for other purposes.
|
|
Policy
coordination
|
|
|
Corruption is an acute and endemic
problem in Nicaragua and its political culture. The legal, political and
administrative accounting structures may enable transparency and integrity of
the public administration and punish criminal conduct, but enforcement is
lagging in most instances.
|
|
Anti-corruption
policy
|
|
|
16 | Consensus-Building
|
|
|
|
|
All important political actors basically
agree on the goals of a market economy and democracy. The parties still
differ regarding their policies concerning redistribution of wealth and the
emphasis on social aspects. Characteristically, foreign investors and local
businesses reacted very cautiously to the electoral victory of Ortega in
2006. Ortega immediately tried to reassure investors of his economic policy.
Internationally, he stressed the importance of good relations with the United
States and the multilateral institutions as well as DR-CAFTA, despite his
plans to deepen foreign relations with Venezuela. Influential political
leaders, while claiming their support for democracy and a market economy,
attempt to design these institutions to pursue their own economic interests
and personal ambitions for power in a manner that is extremely detrimental to
the functional capabilities of political institutions and to the welfare of
the population. The constitutional amendment proposed by parliament
curtailing executive powers provided a vivid example: the proposal triggered
a serious political crisis that lasted for nearly the whole year of 2005. In
the end, a compromise was reached to postpone the reforms until January 2007.
However, after winning the elections in 2006, Ortega immediately proposed
reforms strengthening the executive and allowing for the re-election of the
president.
|
|
Consensus on goals
|
|
|
Anti-democratic veto powers had been
appeased before the evaluation period. The danger rather rests with political
actors who, within the democratic framework, undermine Nicaragua’s democracy
to further their personal aims.
|
|
Anti-democratic
veto actors
|
|
|
The political leadership, despite pacts
made behind closed doors, displays strong polarization along political and
social cleavages. The low level of social cohesion due to socio-economic
differences can only be reduced over the long term. The political divide
created during the Sandinista regime and the injustices of the Contra war
also have yet to be addressed sufficiently. Yet, politicians also prevent
these cleavage-based conflicts from escalating, and sometimes use patriotic
rhetoric to achieve greater unity and to foster a spirit of solidarity among
citizens. Without actions to fortify these appeals, they remain largely
unsuccessful. The actual risk of large-scale violent conflict is small,
however.
|
|
Cleavage /
conflict management
|
|
|
The government promoted the participation
of civil society, but the record remained contradictory concerning the
influence of participation. It also has to be heeded that many organizations
are not independent actors but rather partisan organizations. Since 1999, an
advisory body made up of different interest groups and organizations (CONPES)
advises the president on economic and social programs. The Bolaños administration involved civil society in the
political debate and the formulation of policies. However, after the
political crisis during 2005, the participation of civil society decreased
and was limited mostly to organizations that backed the reform program of the
government.
|
|
Civil
society participation
|
|
|
Political leaders have little incentive
to redress historical injustices of the Sandinista era seriously, because
they provide a comfortable base to mobilize the population for their
respective causes. Therefore, reconciliation remains an exercise in rhetoric.
|
|
Reconciliation
|
|
|
17 | International Cooperation
|
|
|
|
|
Nicaragua is extremely dependent upon
support from abroad. Efforts to attract international assistance and to
reduce the external debt have been central foreign policy themes since the
beginning of the 1990s. The Bolaños administration
integrated international assistance well into domestic reform programs. It
used its international acumen to enhance its reforms in many areas but also
adapted external advice to domestic realities, coming up with innovations
such as the introduction of sector round tables and sector-wide approaches.
Foreign assistance historically has been inefficient and ineffective, due to
a high degree of earmarking, the isolation of projects and a supply-driven
character.
|
|
Effective use of support
|
|
|
The international donor community
regarded the Bolaños administration as credible and
reliable. Therefore, it introduced budget support in 2004 and doubled funds channeled through this instrument in 2005, totaling $110 million. Other states also trusted the Bolaños administration. For the upcoming trade
negotiations with the European Union, four Central American countries
(excluding Costa Rica) have nominated the outgoing Nicaraguan minister of
foreign affairs, Norman Caldera, as their negotiator. FDI inflows of $290
million or 5.5% of GDP in 2006 also confirmed trust of international
investors. However, negative commercial risk ratings illustrate the problems
and risks of Nicaragua’s economic and political development.
|
|
Credibility
|
|
|
The government actively sought to develop
and consolidate cooperative international relationships. Nicaragua is a
member of all important international bodies. Nicaragua also actively
furthers Central American integration. The Bolaños
administration’s most important project of regional integration was the
DR-CAFTA. Nicaragua has brought two territorial disputes before the
International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague that have not yet been
decided. In December 1999, Nicaragua initiated proceedings against Honduras
and, in December 2001, against Colombia over maritime delimitation. Hearings
on both cases commence during 2007. Relations with neighboring
Costa Rica were difficult during most of the evaluation period. In September
2005, Costa Rica took the issue of navigation rights on the San Juan River to
the ICJ and passed a law to control inflows of migrant workers from
Nicaragua. When the new Costa Rican president Óscar
Arias took office in May 2006, relations improved again. On the Atlantic
coast, drug trafficking and arms-for-drugs dealings increased. Nicaraguan
police and naval guards have not yet been able to control the situation.
|
|
Regional
cooperation
|
|
|
Strategic Outlook
|
|
|
In January 2007, after three
unsuccessful campaigns, Daniel Ortega resumed power as president. The split
of the conservative parties allowed Ortega to win with only 38% of the vote.
Political turbulence will continue under Ortega, because the Sandinista
National Liberation Front (FSLN) does not control a majority in parliament;
it will have to cooperate with the Liberal Constitutional Party (PLC) or the
Nicaraguan Liberal Alliance (ALN). Most likely the pacto
político will be renewed, but there is also the
possibility that the two conservative parties will build a coalition. This
would limit Ortega’s room for maneuver
considerably, as he cannot even draw legitimacy from a majority of votes. The
renewal of the pacto político
would be perhaps the worst outcome; the best solution would be a consensus on
a reform program between the FSLN and ALN. To strengthen democracy, different
reforms must be pursued. The politicization of important state institutions
like the Supreme Court, the Comptroller General or the Electoral Commission
must be reversed. The proposed reforms of the judiciary must be implemented
in order to guarantee its independence, and corruption must be curtailed. The
participation of civil society also must be strengthened and the
administrative system enhanced. In the realm of economics, the reforms that
have been implemented enable a sound macroeconomic framework and support
economic growth. One of the most important tasks is to enhance the human
capital of Nicaragua. To raise the participation of the population in the formal
economy as well as to raise productivity levels that would create higher
incomes will be decisive for Nicaragua’s long-term economic growth. The
internal debt situation has to be watched closely and its risks mitigated.
Another key issue will be to reach a final decision on the property rights of
formerly expropriated and collectivized lands and companies. This would
especially boost agricultural production, entailing a direct positive impact
on the lives of the rural poor. Besides the poverty-mitigating effects of
economic reforms, measures directly targeting poverty also have to be
implemented. The access to and quality of public services such as education
and health care should be considerably increased. Furthermore, to mitigate
the negative effects of ecological degradation and natural disasters,
environmental considerations must carry more weight in policy-making. A
national consensus on these reforms must be reached, and should be supported
by the international community. The international community can resort to
Nicaraguan actors and organizations that are committed to these causes, and
can offer its expertise and financial resources as well as political pressure
on the government to implement these reforms.
|

|
 |
 |




|
 |